Message312485
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2018-02-21.09:56:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1519206981.62.0.467229070634.issue32893@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Currently ast.literal_eval() accepts AST representing expressions like "+True" or "True+2j" if constants are represented as Constant. This is because the type of the value is tested with `isinstance(left, (int, float))` and since bool is a subclass of int it passes this test. The proposed PR makes ast.literal_eval() using tests for exact type. I don't think it is worth backporting since it affects only passing AST to ast.literal_eval(). Usually ast.literal_eval() is used for evaluating strings. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-02-21 09:56:21 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka |
| 2018-02-21 09:56:21 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1519206981.62.0.467229070634.issue32893@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-02-21 09:56:21 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue32893 messages |
| 2018-02-21 09:56:21 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |