Message312625
| Author | Mark.Shannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, methane, ned.deily, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-02-23.10:16:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1519381015.03.0.467229070634.issue32911@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Serhiy, thanks for reopening this issue. It seems to be that there are three reasonable choices: 1. Revert to 3.6 behaviour, with the addition of `docstring` attribute. 2. Change the docstring attribute to an AST node, possibly by modifying the grammar. 3. Do nothing. I would prefer 1, as it requires no changes to 3rd party code and doesn't present an additional obstacle when porting from Python 2. 2 would be acceptable, as it allows tools to easily convert the body back to its 3.6 form (or vice-versa) 3 is a pain as it involves re-tokenizing the file to get the location of the doc-string. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-02-23 10:16:55 | Mark.Shannon | set | recipients: + Mark.Shannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, methane, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2018-02-23 10:16:55 | Mark.Shannon | set | messageid: <1519381015.03.0.467229070634.issue32911@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-02-23 10:16:55 | Mark.Shannon | link | issue32911 messages |
| 2018-02-23 10:16:54 | Mark.Shannon | create | |