Message313360
| Author | Petter S |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Petter S, asvetlov, pdxjohnny, r.david.murray, yselivanov, zach.ware |
| Date | 2018-03-06.19:34:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1520364860.42.0.467229070634.issue32972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Also, I personally subclassed TestCase in many of my projects specifically to add async support. To do that you have to use a metaclass to scan class' namespace for 'async def' functions. Doesn't that break when, for example, test methods are decorated with unittest.mock.patch? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-03-06 19:34:20 | Petter S | set | recipients: + Petter S, r.david.murray, asvetlov, zach.ware, yselivanov, pdxjohnny |
| 2018-03-06 19:34:20 | Petter S | set | messageid: <1520364860.42.0.467229070634.issue32972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-03-06 19:34:20 | Petter S | link | issue32972 messages |
| 2018-03-06 19:34:20 | Petter S | create | |