Message313827
| Author | p-ganssle |
|---|---|
| Recipients | bbayles, dstufft, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, p-ganssle |
| Date | 2018-03-14.15:16:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1521040566.51.0.467229070634.issue33069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
One thing that's unclear to me is whether PKG-INFO metadata spec should be considered exhaustive or whether you can add additional fields and still be considered compliant with the spec. If the latter is true, I think there's some case to be made for populating Maintainer: and Maintainer-Email: even in a purely Metadata-Version: 1.1 PKG-INFO file. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-03-14 15:16:06 | p-ganssle | set | recipients: + p-ganssle, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, dstufft, bbayles |
| 2018-03-14 15:16:06 | p-ganssle | set | messageid: <1521040566.51.0.467229070634.issue33069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-03-14 15:16:06 | p-ganssle | link | issue33069 messages |
| 2018-03-14 15:16:06 | p-ganssle | create | |