Message314360
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Marcus.Smith, dstufft, ncoghlan, ned.deily, paul.moore |
| Date | 2018-03-24.07:27:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1521876461.03.0.467229070634.issue33131@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Paul brought up recently [1] that with pip 10.0.0 due for release next month [2], we'd really prefer to ship that in Python 3.7.0 (such that 3.7 launches with PEP 518/517 pyproject.toml support), rather than shipping with 9.0.x and then upgrading to 10.0.0 in Python 3.7.1. The timing is such that 10.0.0 won't quite be ready for 3.7.0b3, but it should be released before 3.7.0b4 at the end of April. [1] https://github.com/pypa/packaging-problems/issues/127#issuecomment-374183609 [2] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2018-March/032047.html |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-03-24 07:27:41 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, paul.moore, ned.deily, dstufft, Marcus.Smith |
| 2018-03-24 07:27:41 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1521876461.03.0.467229070634.issue33131@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-03-24 07:27:40 | ncoghlan | link | issue33131 messages |
| 2018-03-24 07:27:40 | ncoghlan | create | |