Message314472
| Author | Dakon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Dakon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, doko, gco, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner, ztane |
| Date | 2018-03-26.17:40:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1522086000.6.0.467229070634.issue28055@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
So, what is the problem with this? Either the compiler knows that unaligned accesses are no problem and optimizes them away anyway, or it is kept because it would crash otherwise. I can confirm that no sparc version >= 3.5 (have not tried older) survives the test suite on Gentoo Sparc (64 bit kernel, 32 bit userspace) without memcpy(). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-03-26 17:40:00 | Dakon | set | recipients: + Dakon, doko, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, ztane, gco |
| 2018-03-26 17:40:00 | Dakon | set | messageid: <1522086000.6.0.467229070634.issue28055@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-03-26 17:40:00 | Dakon | link | issue28055 messages |
| 2018-03-26 17:40:00 | Dakon | create | |