Message314589
| Author | yanirh |
|---|---|
| Recipients | giampaolo.rodola, paul.moore, pitrou, steve.dower, tim.golden, yanirh, zach.ware |
| Date | 2018-03-28.13:33:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1522244013.81.0.467229070634.issue33166@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Maybe i'm missing something, and would appreciate clarification. Perhaps psutil is wrong, but it gives an answer that has something to do with the actual situation. On platform 2, i have 2 Intel Xeon Gold 6138, each with 20 physical processors, 40 logicals. you are saying i need to rely on os.cpu_count(), which outputs '128'. Can you elaborate on this? Moreover, when attempting to parallelize on the processors, i reach 25% utilization, which suggests Python 'sees' only one processor group. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-03-28 13:33:33 | yanirh | set | recipients: + yanirh, paul.moore, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2018-03-28 13:33:33 | yanirh | set | messageid: <1522244013.81.0.467229070634.issue33166@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-03-28 13:33:33 | yanirh | link | issue33166 messages |
| 2018-03-28 13:33:33 | yanirh | create | |