Message314726
| Author | levkivskyi |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ricyteach, eric.smith, levkivskyi |
| Date | 2018-03-30.22:51:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1522450299.21.0.467229070634.issue33188@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> If we're going to call new_class in make_dataclass, then we should change the signature of make_dataclass to have the new_class parameters. Why? I think we should care about what API/signature is reasonable/typical for dataclasses use cases, while new_class is really just an implementation detail. IMO passing keyword arguments to metaclass will be much more rare for dataclasses than passing a ready namespace. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-03-30 22:51:39 | levkivskyi | set | recipients: + levkivskyi, eric.smith, Ricyteach |
| 2018-03-30 22:51:39 | levkivskyi | set | messageid: <1522450299.21.0.467229070634.issue33188@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-03-30 22:51:39 | levkivskyi | link | issue33188 messages |
| 2018-03-30 22:51:39 | levkivskyi | create | |