Message315090
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Matt Spitz, bquinlan, dmacnet, iunknwn, josh.r, pitrou, tomMoral, torsten |
| Date | 2018-04-08.18:32:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1523212340.14.0.682650639539.issue24882@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm not fond of this proposal. The existing behaviour is harmless; especially for a thread pool, since threads are cheap resources. Improving the logic a bit might seem nice, but it also complicates the executor implementation a bit more. Besides, once the N threads are spawned, they remain alive until the executor is shut down. So all it takes is a spike in incoming requests and you don't save resources anymore. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-04-08 18:32:20 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, bquinlan, torsten, josh.r, Matt Spitz, tomMoral, dmacnet, iunknwn |
| 2018-04-08 18:32:20 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1523212340.14.0.682650639539.issue24882@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-04-08 18:32:20 | pitrou | link | issue24882 messages |
| 2018-04-08 18:32:20 | pitrou | create | |