Message316110
| Author | josh.r |
|---|---|
| Recipients | josh.r, jujuwoman |
| Date | 2018-05-03.04:41:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1525322469.1.0.682650639539.issue33381@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Note: strftime follows the existing documentation:
>>> datetime.datetime(1970, 1, 1, microsecond=1).strftime('%f')
'000001'
The strptime behavior bug seems like a duplicate of #32267, which claims to be fixed in master as of early January; may not have made it into a release yet though. I can't figure out how to view the patch on that issue, it doesn't seem to be linked to GitHub like normal. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-05-03 04:41:09 | josh.r | set | recipients: + josh.r, jujuwoman |
| 2018-05-03 04:41:09 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1525322469.1.0.682650639539.issue33381@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-05-03 04:41:09 | josh.r | link | issue33381 messages |
| 2018-05-03 04:41:08 | josh.r | create | |