Message317842
| Author | vinay.sajip |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ned.deily, p-ganssle, paulc, vinay.sajip |
| Date | 2018-05-28.12:36:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1527511018.55.0.682650639539.issue33400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Because the specs allow certain decisions to be taken "by mutual consent", I'm not sure anyone can be really happy. Perhaps I should just state what the format actually is, as per msg316662, refer to RFC 3339 and leave it at that. I don't have a copy of the ISO 8601 standard and so can't confirm exactly what it states. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-05-28 12:36:58 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients: + vinay.sajip, ned.deily, p-ganssle, paulc |
| 2018-05-28 12:36:58 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1527511018.55.0.682650639539.issue33400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-05-28 12:36:58 | vinay.sajip | link | issue33400 messages |
| 2018-05-28 12:36:58 | vinay.sajip | create | |