Message319490
| Author | adelfino |
|---|---|
| Recipients | adelfino, docs@python, rhettinger |
| Date | 2018-06-14.03:01:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1528945289.28.0.947875510639.issue33726@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yeah, I think you are right. The motivation for this PR was to not have two PEPs references in the same line, because, IMHO, it looks somewhat weird. Now, they look like: "See also: PEP 3115 - Metaclasses in Python 3 PEP 3129 - Class Decorators" Would a change to make it look like: """ See also: PEP 3115 - Metaclasses in Python 3 PEP 3129 - Class Decorators """ be accepted? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-06-14 03:01:29 | adelfino | set | recipients: + adelfino, rhettinger, docs@python |
| 2018-06-14 03:01:29 | adelfino | set | messageid: <1528945289.28.0.947875510639.issue33726@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-06-14 03:01:29 | adelfino | link | issue33726 messages |
| 2018-06-14 03:01:28 | adelfino | create | |