Message320549
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Serge Anuchin, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-06-27.07:07:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1530083258.71.0.56676864532.issue24567@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I concur with Tim. Marking the original bug as "won't fix" for the reasons that he listed. In a separate PR, I'll modify the last line random.choices() to be "return [population[bisect(cum_weights, random() * total, 0, hi)] for i in range(k)]". That will make the function more robust (handling the exotic case with subnormal weights). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-06-27 07:07:38 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, Serge Anuchin |
| 2018-06-27 07:07:38 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1530083258.71.0.56676864532.issue24567@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-06-27 07:07:38 | rhettinger | link | issue24567 messages |
| 2018-06-27 07:07:38 | rhettinger | create | |