Message321529
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, methane, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-07-12.08:41:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1531384882.13.0.56676864532.issue34093@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> So startup must not be slower than 4%. I know. But Python does more than compile()+dumps() at the first run. I'm curious if it is feasible to measure this cost. But it may be hard to get reliable benchmarks, since I expect that the difference will be very small, and I know very well that measuring Python startup is hard since it depends a lot of on the filesystem which is hard to measure. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-07-12 08:41:22 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, benjamin.peterson, methane, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2018-07-12 08:41:22 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1531384882.13.0.56676864532.issue34093@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-07-12 08:41:22 | vstinner | link | issue34093 messages |
| 2018-07-12 08:41:22 | vstinner | create | |