Message321716
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | arigo, bup, docs@python, methane, rhettinger |
| Date | 2018-07-16.07:57:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1531727869.8.0.56676864532.issue34123@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Is there no possible optimizations by breaking LIFO dict.popitem()? Even if there were a possible optimization, we wouldn't care. The API is too desirable to forgo in the name of micro-optimization. We don't design our APIs that way -- trading the relevant and actionable for ethereal and unknown. Also, it is common sense that addition of a key/value pair at the end is a readily undoable operation (no more expensive to remove than it was to add). There will be a dummy entry in the hash array just like there is now. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-07-16 07:57:49 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, arigo, methane, docs@python, bup |
| 2018-07-16 07:57:49 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1531727869.8.0.56676864532.issue34123@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-07-16 07:57:49 | rhettinger | link | issue34123 messages |
| 2018-07-16 07:57:49 | rhettinger | create | |