Message321824
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | arekm, axh, brett.cannon, gul916, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-07-17.13:37:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1531834625.58.0.56676864532.issue25150@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think this should be reconsidered. I understand the desire to compile Python with OpenMP. But the resolution here is hiding _Py_atomic symbols all the time, even when OpenMP isn't involved, and even when building a standard extension module. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-07-17 13:37:05 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, arekm, scoder, vstinner, python-dev, axh, gul916 |
| 2018-07-17 13:37:05 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1531834625.58.0.56676864532.issue25150@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-07-17 13:37:05 | pitrou | link | issue25150 messages |
| 2018-07-17 13:37:05 | pitrou | create | |