Message 322114 - Python tracker

Message322114

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, kayhayen, levkivskyi, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date	2018-07-21.17:52:57
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAP7+vJJ3UkKZwF5_OD6q-bAnYg-dntJu4GRY2bQi6rVaa_s_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1532190834.15.0.56676864532.issue34136@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I wouldn’t object. Of course my opinion no longer matters that much. On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:33 AM Serhiy Storchaka <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpython@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Shouldn't it be deleted in 3.7+ too? The behavior tested after PR 8364 > (falling back to the global __annotations__) looks to me even more > questionable than NameError. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue34136> > _______________________________________ > -- --Guido (mobile)

Content

I wouldn’t object. Of course my opinion no longer matters that much.

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:33 AM Serhiy Storchaka <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpython@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Shouldn't it be deleted in 3.7+ too? The behavior tested after PR 8364
> (falling back to the global __annotations__) looks to me even more
> questionable than NameError.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34136>
> _______________________________________
>
-- 
--Guido (mobile)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-07-21 17:52:57	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, terry.reedy, kayhayen, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi
2018-07-21 17:52:57	gvanrossum	link	issue34136 messages
2018-07-21 17:52:57	gvanrossum	create