Message32257
| Author | lpd |
|---|---|
| Recipients | |
| Date | 2007-06-08.05:36:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | |
| Marked as misclassified | |
| Message-id | |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I could probably live with that. However, there are other kinds of objects being used as keys in the same dictionary, and I can't just repr() them all, because it is not true that a == b implies repr(a) == repr(b). (E.g., a = 3, b = 3.0.) Practicalities aside, it just seems silly to me that a simple type like slice should have all the prerequisites for being hashable and yet isn't, especially when much more complex types like methods are both comparable and hashable. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2007-08-23 14:54:44 | admin | link | issue1733184 messages |
| 2007-08-23 14:54:44 | admin | create | |