Message322932
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | CyberJacob, Decorater, Matt Groth, ellisj, eric.araujo, mwh, ncoghlan, nikratio, pitrou, tiagoaoa, tim.peters, undercoveridiot, vlasovskikh, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-08-02.09:21:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1533201688.59.0.56676864532.issue1230540@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Would it be possible to modify the default implementation of sys.excepthook to have a different output when it's not called from the main thread? Mimick the current traceback from threads. Would it be possible to call threading.current_thread() from the default sys.excepthook? The problem is to get the threading module and to decide how to handle error on getting the current thread. An alternative would be to introduce a new hook to log exceptions in threads, ex: sys.threadexcepthook. That hoook would take a 4th parameter. But Andrey Vlasovskikh didn't like this idea. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-08-02 09:21:28 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, mwh, tim.peters, ncoghlan, ellisj, pitrou, tiagoaoa, eric.araujo, nikratio, undercoveridiot, vlasovskikh, Decorater, CyberJacob, Matt Groth |
| 2018-08-02 09:21:28 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1533201688.59.0.56676864532.issue1230540@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-08-02 09:21:28 | vstinner | link | issue1230540 messages |
| 2018-08-02 09:21:28 | vstinner | create | |