Message323115
| Author | jdemeyer |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, eric.snow, erik.bray, jdemeyer, ncoghlan, paul.moore, petr.viktorin, sth |
| Date | 2018-08-04.17:39:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1533404389.7.0.56676864532.issue32797@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Then instead of adding the source directory to sys.path What's wrong with that? Installing the .pyx sources together with the .so compiled modules makes a lot of sense to me: it is very analogous to installing the .py sources together with the .pyc byte-compiled files. In https://bugs.python.org/issue32797#msg315965 Paul Moore disagreed with that analogy, but I don't quite understand why. And if ${prefix}/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/PKGNAME is not a good place to store the installed sources, where would you want to install them otherwise? > (which was only working because the legacy import system never implemented PEP 302 properly) Not sure what you mean here... |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-08-04 17:39:49 | jdemeyer | set | recipients: + jdemeyer, brett.cannon, paul.moore, ncoghlan, petr.viktorin, erik.bray, eric.snow, sth |
| 2018-08-04 17:39:49 | jdemeyer | set | messageid: <1533404389.7.0.56676864532.issue32797@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-08-04 17:39:49 | jdemeyer | link | issue32797 messages |
| 2018-08-04 17:39:49 | jdemeyer | create | |