Message324015
| Author | Michael.Felt |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Michael.Felt, hynek, ned.deily, python-dev, ronaldoussoren, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2018-08-24.20:40:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1535143222.1.0.56676864532.issue20682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Inspired by msg211764 I made a PR - which I hope is okay to add here. If not, a new issue and PR can be made later. In short: For address family of AF_UNIX or AF_UNIX_CCSID, getsockname() returns 0 if issued before a bind(). The address length is 0. This is always the case for sockets created by socketpair(). That is at least one possible explanation I found. Have testewd on AIX 6.1 and AIX 7.1 - on AF_UNIX family getsockname() returns 'None' (i.e., transport.get_extra_info('sockname') returns None) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-08-24 20:40:22 | Michael.Felt | set | recipients: + Michael.Felt, ronaldoussoren, vstinner, ned.deily, python-dev, hynek, yselivanov |
| 2018-08-24 20:40:22 | Michael.Felt | set | messageid: <1535143222.1.0.56676864532.issue20682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-08-24 20:40:22 | Michael.Felt | link | issue20682 messages |
| 2018-08-24 20:40:21 | Michael.Felt | create | |