Message325181
| Author | eric.snow |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.snow, gregory.p.smith |
| Date | 2018-09-12.21:04:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1536786263.28.0.956365154283.issue34651@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
os.fork() potentially has some problematic behavior when called from a subinterpreter. In additional to the normal fork+threads madness, there's the question of what to do with existing subinterpreters. The simplest solution is to simply disallow fork in a subinterpreter and then wipe out all subinterpreters in the child process post-fork (if os.fork() called in the main interpreter). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-09-12 21:04:23 | eric.snow | set | recipients: + eric.snow, gregory.p.smith |
| 2018-09-12 21:04:23 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1536786263.28.0.956365154283.issue34651@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-09-12 21:04:23 | eric.snow | link | issue34651 messages |
| 2018-09-12 21:04:23 | eric.snow | create | |