Message325876
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Eric.Wieser, Stephan Hoyer, belopolsky, gvanrossum, josh.r, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters |
| Date | 2018-09-20.13:48:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1537451316.91.0.956365154283.issue30140@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Note that we've left a similar operand precedence handling issue languishing for a long time over compatibility concerns: https://bugs.python.org/issue11477 In that case, NumPy is actually benefiting from the discrepancy with the documentation though, as the lower-than-expected precedence of sq_concat and sq_repeat is what allows NumPy arrays to always take precedence over builtin container types, even when the array is the right hand operand. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-09-20 13:48:36 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, serhiy.storchaka, Eric.Wieser, josh.r, Stephan Hoyer |
| 2018-09-20 13:48:36 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1537451316.91.0.956365154283.issue30140@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-09-20 13:48:36 | ncoghlan | link | issue30140 messages |
| 2018-09-20 13:48:36 | ncoghlan | create | |