Message326259
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2018-09-24.15:58:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1537804725.13.0.956365154283.issue34037@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Maybe. At least we need to add a "timeout" argument to asyncio.run() to let it wait for executor jobs. The shutdown() method of concurrent.futures.Executor API doesn't accept a timeout. It waits for multiple things. I added "block_on_close = True" class attribute to socketserver.ForkingMixIn and socketserver.ThreadingMixIn. By default, server_close() waits until all children complete, but the wait is non-blocking if block_on_close is false. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-09-24 15:58:45 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, asvetlov, yselivanov |
| 2018-09-24 15:58:45 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1537804725.13.0.956365154283.issue34037@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-09-24 15:58:45 | vstinner | link | issue34037 messages |
| 2018-09-24 15:58:45 | vstinner | create | |