Message327217
| Author | matrixise |
|---|---|
| Recipients | cheryl.sabella, docs@python, lys.nikolaou, matrixise, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tim.peters |
| Date | 2018-10-06.05:12:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1538802745.59.0.545547206417.issue34839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hi Terry, You say we need to keep this illustration with a section 'before 3.6' but in think it's a bad thing. 1. when you read a documentation, you just copy the example, and sometimes you don't read the requirements. 2. why do we need to keep an illustration for a previous version of Python? since >= 3.6 we keep the order (officially in 3.7), in this case, the example is useless, because you read the documentation of >= 3.7. I would prefer to remove this example for >= 3.6 and keep the illustration for the previous version. I am really interested by the feedback of Tim, Cheryl and Raymond. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-10-06 05:12:25 | matrixise | set | recipients: + matrixise, tim.peters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, docs@python, cheryl.sabella, lys.nikolaou |
| 2018-10-06 05:12:25 | matrixise | set | messageid: <1538802745.59.0.545547206417.issue34839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-10-06 05:12:25 | matrixise | link | issue34839 messages |
| 2018-10-06 05:12:25 | matrixise | create | |