Message328761
| Author | izbyshev |
|---|---|
| Recipients | berker.peksag, izbyshev, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters |
| Date | 2018-10-28.21:50:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1540763411.97.0.788709270274.issue35091@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> This doesn't actually matter - the code can never trigger. Yes, I considered this, and wondered why assert wasn't used in the first place, but the explicit check with a comment suggested that possibility of overflow was deemed real. I've submitted a third PR that simply removes the checks and adds asserts instead. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-10-28 21:50:12 | izbyshev | set | recipients: + izbyshev, tim.peters, pitrou, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2018-10-28 21:50:11 | izbyshev | set | messageid: <1540763411.97.0.788709270274.issue35091@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-10-28 21:50:11 | izbyshev | link | issue35091 messages |
| 2018-10-28 21:50:11 | izbyshev | create | |