Message329555
| Author | taleinat |
|---|---|
| Recipients | rhettinger, taleinat, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2018-11-09.20:42:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1541796126.84.0.788709270274.issue35196@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> If you write to stdout by small chunks, it adds a large overhead to every write() call. While I agree that there is great room for optimization in Squeezer's interception of write(), it doesn't appear to have a noticeable effect in such cases, e.g. in the examples provided by Raymond in the first comment. In my testing, even removing the write() interception entirely doesn't have an effect I can notice. I'm happy to optimize it anyways, there is plenty of "low hanging fruit" there. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-11-09 20:42:06 | taleinat | set | recipients: + taleinat, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| 2018-11-09 20:42:06 | taleinat | set | messageid: <1541796126.84.0.788709270274.issue35196@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-11-09 20:42:06 | taleinat | link | issue35196 messages |
| 2018-11-09 20:42:06 | taleinat | create | |