Message329927
| Author | davin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, davin, kapilt, ned.deily, pitrou, ronaldoussoren |
| Date | 2018-11-14.19:42:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1542224547.66.0.788709270274.issue33725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Given the original post mentioned 2.7.15, I wonder if it is feasible to fork near the beginning of execution, then maintain and pass around a multiprocessing.Pool to be used when needed instead of dynamically forking? Working with legacy code is almost always more interesting than you want it to be. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-11-14 19:42:27 | davin | set | recipients: + davin, barry, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, ned.deily, kapilt |
| 2018-11-14 19:42:27 | davin | set | messageid: <1542224547.66.0.788709270274.issue33725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-11-14 19:42:27 | davin | link | issue33725 messages |
| 2018-11-14 19:42:27 | davin | create | |