Message330363
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Aaron Hall, benjamin.peterson, eric.snow, mark.dickinson, miss-islington, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, thatiparthy, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-11-23.22:18:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CA+3bQGEq601+uEkXa2e9Seg-0P-Kv3Bprknb31X_o9+Zu5Q58w@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1542997210.25.0.788709270274.issue35059@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Could we have used function overloading to handle the different types? Rather than reintroducing the macro for the sake of the cast? Sorry, I don't know what is function overloading. Is it a C++ thing? Py_INCREF() must accept any type based on PyObject. At least, this issue shouldn't make the situation worse :-) Please open a new issue if you have a solution for this problem. I am now curious since I tried many things and I failed to find anything working for all cases. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-11-23 22:18:08 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, mark.dickinson, benjamin.peterson, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, thatiparthy, Aaron Hall, pablogsal, miss-islington |
| 2018-11-23 22:18:08 | vstinner | link | issue35059 messages |
| 2018-11-23 22:18:08 | vstinner | create | |