Message330579
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | a-j-buxton, augustogoulart, pablogsal, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka, taleinat, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2018-11-28.08:27:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1543393666.7.0.788709270274.issue33930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It is hard to get a noticeable difference in macrobenchmarks. I want to see results of microbenchmarks. For tuples, the trashcan mechanism is the main culprit of the performance hit when use short-living tuples for passing arguments. For bound method objects the relative effect should be smaller, because looking up the method is more costly than building a tuple, and less bound method objects are created after implementing the method call optimization. But in any case we should know the maximal cost of this change before merging it. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-11-28 08:27:46 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, terry.reedy, ronaldoussoren, vstinner, taleinat, pablogsal, augustogoulart, a-j-buxton |
| 2018-11-28 08:27:46 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1543393666.7.0.788709270274.issue33930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-11-28 08:27:46 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue33930 messages |
| 2018-11-28 08:27:46 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |