Message 330676 - Python tracker

Message330676

Author	vstinner
Recipients	ZackerySpytz, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2018-11-29.10:57:54
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1543489074.99.0.788709270274.issue35337@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> This is compatibility breaking change. Right. The question is if you are ok with it :-) > Currently you can get the address of the array of tuple items by using &PyTuple_GET_ITEM(obj, 0). I don't get your point. I know that you access directly obj->ob_item to use directly the C array rather than PyTuple_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_SET_ITEM, but the issue is about making PyTuple_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_SET_ITEM stricter in debug mode.

Content

> This is compatibility breaking change.

Right. The question is if you are ok with it :-)

> Currently you can get the address of the array of tuple items by using &PyTuple_GET_ITEM(obj, 0).

I don't get your point. I know that you access directly obj->ob_item to use directly the C array rather than PyTuple_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_SET_ITEM, but the issue is about making PyTuple_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_SET_ITEM stricter in debug mode.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-11-29 10:57:55	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, ZackerySpytz
2018-11-29 10:57:54	vstinner	set	messageid: <1543489074.99.0.788709270274.issue35337@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-11-29 10:57:54	vstinner	link	issue35337 messages
2018-11-29 10:57:54	vstinner	create