Message331101
| Author | ronaldoussoren |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, davin, kapilt, ned.deily, pitrou, ronaldoussoren |
| Date | 2018-12-05.11:52:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1544010745.48.0.788709270274.issue33725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
AFAIK there is nothing you can do between after calling fork(2) to "reinitialise" the ObjC runtime. And I don't think that's the issue anyway: I suspect that the actual problem is that Apple's system frameworks use multithreading (in particular libdispatch) and don't have code to ensure a sane state after calling fork. In Python 3 there is another workaround to avoid problems using multiprocessing: use multiprocessing.set_start_method() to switch away from the "fork" startup handler to "spawn" or "forkserver" (the latter only when calling set_start_method before calling any code that might call into Apple system frameworks. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-12-05 11:52:25 | ronaldoussoren | set | recipients: + ronaldoussoren, barry, pitrou, ned.deily, davin, kapilt |
| 2018-12-05 11:52:25 | ronaldoussoren | set | messageid: <1544010745.48.0.788709270274.issue33725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-12-05 11:52:25 | ronaldoussoren | link | issue33725 messages |
| 2018-12-05 11:52:25 | ronaldoussoren | create | |