Message331405
| Author | steven.daprano |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Windson Yang, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, nedbat, orlnub123, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, terry.reedy, vstinner, xtreak |
| Date | 2018-12-09.02:18:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20181209021847.GR13061@ando.pearwood.info> |
| In-reply-to | <1544320883.49.0.788709270274.issue35105@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Any ideas? Or I will create a PR in a week without 'CPython implementation detail' I don't think we want to give any stability guarantees for this. Perhaps we should explicitly state that this is not guaranteed behaviour and may change in the future. I would be happy for it to be stated as an CPython implementation detail. If PyPy or any other implementation happen to duplicate it, we're not responsible for documenting that fact. Please go ahead and make a PR. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-12-09 02:18:53 | steven.daprano | set | recipients: + steven.daprano, terry.reedy, vstinner, nedbat, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal, Windson Yang, xtreak, orlnub123 |
| 2018-12-09 02:18:53 | steven.daprano | link | issue35105 messages |
| 2018-12-09 02:18:52 | steven.daprano | create | |