Message333066
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ExplodingCabbage, barry, docs@python, goodger, gvanrossum, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2019-01-05.17:41:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1546710072.51.0.673373238449.issue35651@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
A rejected PEP still exists in perpetuity, and can still be used as a reference. Also, the reason for PEP 258's rejection is not that it is invalid, but that it's not slated for stdlib inclusion. So I think that the reference is still useful, and I don't think there's anything that needs to be done here. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-01-05 17:41:13 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, barry, goodger, terry.reedy, docs@python, ExplodingCabbage |
| 2019-01-05 17:41:12 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1546710072.51.0.673373238449.issue35651@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-01-05 17:41:12 | gvanrossum | link | issue35651 messages |
| 2019-01-05 17:41:12 | gvanrossum | create | |