Message333093
| Author | vajrasky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | antonymayi, drpotato, jcea, lars.gustaebel, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, vajrasky, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-01-06.08:57:32 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1546765052.24.0.684265039179.issue19974@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Martin Panter, I have modernized the patch. About your suggestion: 1. "import errno" -> Yes, this is unnecessary. I have removed it. 2. Use os.path.lexists instead of os.path.islink for broken symlink -> The thing is os.path.islink returns True also for broken symlink. I could not find a case where these methods return different result. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-01-06 08:57:33 | vajrasky | set | recipients: + vajrasky, jcea, lars.gustaebel, vstinner, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, antonymayi, drpotato |
| 2019-01-06 08:57:32 | vajrasky | set | messageid: <1546765052.24.0.684265039179.issue19974@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-01-06 08:57:32 | vajrasky | link | issue19974 messages |
| 2019-01-06 08:57:32 | vajrasky | create | |