Message333591
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ivan.Pozdeev, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, emma_smith, eric.smith, eric.snow, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, takluyver, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-01-14.09:01:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1547456518.6.0.169335368433.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I really hate .pth files because the slow down Python startup time for *all* applications whereas .pth files are usually specific to a very few applications using one or two specific modules. They can also modify the behavior of Python for all applications, with no way to opt-out. I would prefer to have an opt-in option, disabled by default. I'm in favor of deprecating the feature in Python 3.8 and remove it from Python 3.9. Python 3 already support namespaces which covers the most common use case of .pth files, no? Another use case is to run code if a specific command line option is used or if an environment variable is set. For example, my faulthandler backport uses a .pth file to enable faulthandler if PYTHONFAULTHANDLER environment variable is set. I dislike this .pth file (I didn't write it ;-)). I'm fine with dropping this feature as a whole. We can add a pending deprecation warning in Python 3.7 right now. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-01-14 09:01:59 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, mhammond, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, __Vano, eric.snow, takluyver, Ivan.Pozdeev, Anthony Sottile, emma_smith, Chris Billington |
| 2019-01-14 09:01:58 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1547456518.6.0.169335368433.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-01-14 09:01:58 | vstinner | link | issue33944 messages |
| 2019-01-14 09:01:58 | vstinner | create | |