Message334041
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | anh.le, dmi.baranov, madison.may, martin.panter, orsenthil |
| Date | 2019-01-19.06:52:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1547880748.02.0.318455624207.issue18140@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Today I read RFC 3986, and I think the URLs in the bug reports are valid, and are already parsed correctly. The path is allowed to have a literal “at” symbol: path-abempty = *( "/" segment ) segment = *pchar pchar = unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@" The query and fragment are allowed to have “at” and question marks: query = *( pchar / "/" / "?" ) fragment = *( pchar / "/" / "?" ) So I think this could be closed because the parsing is working correctly. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-01-19 06:52:30 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, orsenthil, dmi.baranov, madison.may, anh.le |
| 2019-01-19 06:52:28 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1547880748.02.0.318455624207.issue18140@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-01-19 06:52:28 | martin.panter | link | issue18140 messages |
| 2019-01-19 06:52:27 | martin.panter | create | |