Message334486
| Author | jdemeyer |
|---|---|
| Recipients | AVINASH MISHRA, jdemeyer, josh.r, ncoghlan, remi.lapeyre, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-01-28.18:14:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1548699298.48.0.641639584005.issue35707@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I'm also mildly concerned by how duplicative the code becomes post-patch. I know, that's why I added that comment on GitHub. > perhaps just implement _PyTime_ObjectToTime_t as a wrapper for _PyTime_ObjectToDenominator Sure, but will that increase the chances of PR 11636 being accepted? Unless a core developer who is willing to merge that PR asks me that, I'd rather not add extra complications to that PR. (to be clear: I mean no offense, it's just that getting a CPython PR accepted is hard) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-01-28 18:15:00 | jdemeyer | set | recipients: + jdemeyer, ronaldoussoren, ncoghlan, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, remi.lapeyre, AVINASH MISHRA |
| 2019-01-28 18:14:58 | jdemeyer | set | messageid: <1548699298.48.0.641639584005.issue35707@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-01-28 18:14:58 | jdemeyer | link | issue35707 messages |
| 2019-01-28 18:14:58 | jdemeyer | create | |