Message335394
| Author | taleinat |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Adnan Umer, cheryl.sabella, cjw296, mariocj89, michael.foord, suhearsawho, taleinat, terry.reedy, xtreak |
| Date | 2019-02-13.09:03:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1550048580.96.0.35616336327.issue35500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Susan, I agree that similarly improving the failure message for assert_called_with would be good. I find the final "Not called" line unclear, though. Perhaps something like the following: AssertionError: expected call not found. Expected: mock(1, 2, 3, 4) Actual: Not called |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-13 09:03:00 | taleinat | set | recipients: + taleinat, terry.reedy, cjw296, michael.foord, cheryl.sabella, mariocj89, xtreak, Adnan Umer, suhearsawho |
| 2019-02-13 09:03:00 | taleinat | set | messageid: <1550048580.96.0.35616336327.issue35500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-13 09:03:00 | taleinat | link | issue35500 messages |
| 2019-02-13 09:03:00 | taleinat | create | |