Message335976
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | lschoe, mark.dickinson, pablogsal, rhettinger, skrah, steven.daprano, tim.peters |
| Date | 2019-02-19.16:49:13 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1550594953.7.0.118041009846.issue36027@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Then, it should be considerably faster Why would you expect that? Both algorithms involve a number of (bigint) operations that's proportional to log(p), so it's going to be down to the constants involved and the running times of the individual operations. Is there a clear reason for your expectation that the xgcd-based algorithm should be faster? Remember that Python has a subquadratic multiplication (via Karatsuba), but its division algorithm has quadratic running time. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-19 16:49:13 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, rhettinger, steven.daprano, skrah, pablogsal, lschoe |
| 2019-02-19 16:49:13 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1550594953.7.0.118041009846.issue36027@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-19 16:49:13 | mark.dickinson | link | issue36027 messages |
| 2019-02-19 16:49:13 | mark.dickinson | create | |