Message336130
| Author | lschoe |
|---|---|
| Recipients | lschoe, mark.dickinson, pablogsal, rhettinger, skrah, steven.daprano, tim.peters |
| Date | 2019-02-20.17:55:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1550685319.72.0.0544943617576.issue36027@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
In pure Python this seems to be the better option to compute inverses:
def modinv(a, m): # assuming m > 0
b = m
s, s1 = 1, 0
while b:
a, (q, b) = b, divmod(a, b)
s, s1 = s1, s - q * s1
if a != 1:
raise ValueError('inverse does not exist')
return s if s >= 0 else s + m
Binary xgcd algorithms coded in pure Python run much slower. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-20 17:55:19 | lschoe | set | recipients: + lschoe, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano, skrah, pablogsal |
| 2019-02-20 17:55:19 | lschoe | set | messageid: <1550685319.72.0.0544943617576.issue36027@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-20 17:55:19 | lschoe | link | issue36027 messages |
| 2019-02-20 17:55:19 | lschoe | create | |