Message336233
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | matrixise, ronaldoussoren, salty-horse, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2019-02-21.16:01:51 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1550764911.22.0.407043625317.issue36065@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
If you need to support only bytes and bytearray, but not other bytes-like object, this is a too special case. It is easy to write your own macros or functions that wrap existing C API. Other option -- duplicate the code and replace PyBytes_ with PyByteArray_. In all cases be aware abot differences between bytes and bytearray: bytarray can change its content and size, saved values of PyByteArray_AS_STRING(ob) and PyByteArray_GET_SIZE(self) can not be used after executing arbitrary code in destructors or releasing GIT. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-21 16:01:51 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, ronaldoussoren, salty-horse, matrixise |
| 2019-02-21 16:01:51 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1550764911.22.0.407043625317.issue36065@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-21 16:01:51 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue36065 messages |
| 2019-02-21 16:01:51 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |