Message336434
| Author | davin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | davin, docs@python, steven.daprano |
| Date | 2019-02-24.05:30:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1550986253.13.0.87734656556.issue36099@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Without necessarily defining what each means, perhaps it is sufficient to change this clause in the docs:
it should be the mean of data
For pvariance() it could read as:
it should be the *population* mean of data
And for variance() it could read as:
it should be the *sample* mean of data |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-24 05:30:53 | davin | set | recipients: + davin, steven.daprano, docs@python |
| 2019-02-24 05:30:53 | davin | set | messageid: <1550986253.13.0.87734656556.issue36099@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-24 05:30:53 | davin | link | issue36099 messages |
| 2019-02-24 05:30:53 | davin | create | |