Message336628
| Author | brandtbucher |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brandtbucher |
| Date | 2019-02-26.08:04:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1551168262.55.0.429171834399.issue36117@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Currently, it isn't legal to perform <, >, <=, or >= rich comparisons on any complex objects, even though these operations are mathematically well-defined for real numbers. The attached PR addresses this by defining rich comparisons for real-valued complex objects against subclasses of int and float, as well as for decimal.Decimal and fractions.Fraction types. They still raise TypeErrors when either of the operands has a nonzero imaginary part. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-26 08:04:22 | brandtbucher | set | recipients: + brandtbucher |
| 2019-02-26 08:04:22 | brandtbucher | set | messageid: <1551168262.55.0.429171834399.issue36117@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-26 08:04:22 | brandtbucher | link | issue36117 messages |
| 2019-02-26 08:04:22 | brandtbucher | create | |