Message336685
| Author | methane |
|---|---|
| Recipients | desbma, giampaolo.rodola, methane |
| Date | 2019-02-26.15:38:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1551195500.37.0.566234475573.issue36103@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Read this file too. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/tree/src/ioblksize.h coreutils choose 128KiB for *minimal* buffer size to reduce syscall overhead. In case of shutil, we have Python interpreter overhead adding to syscall overhead. Who has deeper insights than coreutils author? I think 128KiB is the best, but I'm OK to 64KiB for conservative decision. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-26 15:38:20 | methane | set | recipients: + methane, giampaolo.rodola, desbma |
| 2019-02-26 15:38:20 | methane | set | messageid: <1551195500.37.0.566234475573.issue36103@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-26 15:38:20 | methane | link | issue36103 messages |
| 2019-02-26 15:38:20 | methane | create | |