Message336714
| Author | __Vano |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ivan.Pozdeev, SilentGhost, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, cheryl.sabella, christian.heimes, emma_smith, eric.smith, eric.snow, ionelmc, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, steve.dower, takluyver, terry.reedy, veky |
| Date | 2019-02-26.21:23:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <23826c7b-edc9-ca4b-866b-afdf0bb640b4@mail.ru> |
| In-reply-to | <7D783D44-7A43-4DBD-BF1D-CA88937A9E87@python.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 26.02.2019 23:37, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > My opposition would lessen if there were clear ways to debug, and preferably also prevent, pth interpretation. Easy. Insert a chunk into site.py that would call pdb.set_trace() if an envvar (e.g. `PYSITEDEBUG') or a command line switch is set. Actually, why can't whoever has this problem add such a chunk themselves? Is this really such a frequent and ubiquitous problem that this needs to be in the stock codebase? I suspect we're dealing with a vocal minority here. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-26 21:23:19 | __Vano | set | recipients: + __Vano, mhammond, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ionelmc, SilentGhost, eric.snow, takluyver, steve.dower, veky, Ivan.Pozdeev, Anthony Sottile, emma_smith, cheryl.sabella, Chris Billington |
| 2019-02-26 21:23:18 | __Vano | link | issue33944 messages |
| 2019-02-26 21:23:18 | __Vano | create | |