Message 337365 - Python tracker

Message337365

Author	barry
Recipients	Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ivan.Pozdeev, Peter L3, SilentGhost, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, cheryl.sabella, christian.heimes, emma_smith, eric.smith, eric.snow, ionelmc, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, steve.dower, takluyver, terry.reedy, veky
Date	2019-03-07.06:56:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<C3B646A8-724D-4B5A-990C-EB0F54E910E2@python.org>
In-reply-to	<1551927899.06.0.914050581164.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
On Mar 6, 2019, at 19:04, Anthony Sottile <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > It assigns `subprocess.run`, which is an api in python3.5+. In those versions, `subprocess.check_*` is implemented in terms of `subprocess.run`. The `subprocess.run` provided by that package has a different api than the stdlib one so any use of the subprocess module is broken just by having that package installed Doesn’t that kind of prove my point? :)

Content

On Mar 6, 2019, at 19:04, Anthony Sottile <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

> It assigns `subprocess.run`, which is an api in python3.5+.  In those versions, `subprocess.check_*` is implemented in terms of `subprocess.run`.   The `subprocess.run` provided by that package has a different api than the stdlib one so any use of the subprocess module is broken just by having that package installed

Doesn’t that kind of prove my point? :)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-03-07 06:56:21	barry	set	recipients: + barry, mhammond, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ionelmc, SilentGhost, __Vano, eric.snow, takluyver, steve.dower, veky, Ivan.Pozdeev, Anthony Sottile, emma_smith, cheryl.sabella, Chris Billington, Peter L3
2019-03-07 06:56:21	barry	link	issue33944 messages
2019-03-07 06:56:21	barry	create