Message337417
| Author | barry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ivan.Pozdeev, Peter L3, SilentGhost, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, cheryl.sabella, christian.heimes, emma_smith, eric.smith, eric.snow, ionelmc, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, steve.dower, takluyver, terry.reedy, veky |
| Date | 2019-03-07.18:03:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1A8BD07C-3780-435D-B784-5F628EDA1253@python.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1551973136.09.0.645335062096.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mar 7, 2019, at 07:38, Steve Dower <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Steve Dower <steve.dower@python.org> added the comment: > > There are two features here, let's be clear about what we're removing. > > * extending sys.path with static (perhaps relative) directories > * arbitrary code execution (following "import " statements) > > Only Barry wants to remove the first one, and the rest of us will push back hard enough to keep him in check ;) Not true! I’m okay with keeping the path extension feature, albeit with improvements: * Loading of .pth files and path extension should be expressed in verbose (`python -v`) output * It should be possible to much more easily debug .pth file loading (I believe there is a PR for this but I haven’t had time to look at it yet) * It should be possible to prevent .pth file loading, likely via interpreter switch or environment variable, akin to -s/-S |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-03-07 18:03:03 | barry | set | recipients: + barry, mhammond, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ionelmc, SilentGhost, __Vano, eric.snow, takluyver, steve.dower, veky, Ivan.Pozdeev, Anthony Sottile, emma_smith, cheryl.sabella, Chris Billington, Peter L3 |
| 2019-03-07 18:03:03 | barry | link | issue33944 messages |
| 2019-03-07 18:03:03 | barry | create | |