Message337418
| Author | barry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ivan.Pozdeev, Peter L3, SilentGhost, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, cheryl.sabella, christian.heimes, emma_smith, eric.smith, eric.snow, ionelmc, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, steve.dower, takluyver, terry.reedy, veky |
| Date | 2019-03-07.18:13:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <81DEDAAE-C0DE-46B4-BECD-83B66D740B2C@python.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1551979929.48.0.0677026334069.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mar 7, 2019, at 09:32, Anthony Sottile <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > >> I should have to start that package somehow. > > `pip install` is a pretty good opt-in already imo Except that it conflates responsibilities. I may not want to opt into coverage even being loaded in my application because I’m not going to use it and it has a negative impact on my application’s start up time. Yet because you’re on the same machine and you pip installed it, I have no choice but to pay those costs, which I haven’t explicitly opted in to. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-03-07 18:13:43 | barry | set | recipients: + barry, mhammond, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ionelmc, SilentGhost, __Vano, eric.snow, takluyver, steve.dower, veky, Ivan.Pozdeev, Anthony Sottile, emma_smith, cheryl.sabella, Chris Billington, Peter L3 |
| 2019-03-07 18:13:43 | barry | link | issue33944 messages |
| 2019-03-07 18:13:42 | barry | create | |