Message337421
| Author | Anthony Sottile |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, Chris Billington, Ivan.Pozdeev, Peter L3, SilentGhost, __Vano, barry, brett.cannon, cheryl.sabella, christian.heimes, emma_smith, eric.smith, eric.snow, ionelmc, jaraco, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou, steve.dower, takluyver, terry.reedy, veky |
| Date | 2019-03-07.18:22:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1551982949.8.0.116257886202.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
>>> I should have to start that package somehow. >> >> `pip install` is a pretty good opt-in already imo > > Except that it conflates responsibilities. I may not want to opt into coverage even being loaded in my application because I’m not going to use it and it has a negative impact on my application’s start up time. Yet because you’re on the same machine and you pip installed it, I have no choice but to pay those costs, which I haven’t explicitly opted in to. At least for the coverage plugins there is a required opt in from environment variable (as shown above). Though the startup cost is a good point. Perhaps I'm of the minority but I use virtualenvs for everything so I haven't even been considering the system python. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-03-07 18:22:29 | Anthony Sottile | set | recipients: + Anthony Sottile, mhammond, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ionelmc, SilentGhost, __Vano, eric.snow, takluyver, steve.dower, veky, Ivan.Pozdeev, emma_smith, cheryl.sabella, Chris Billington, Peter L3 |
| 2019-03-07 18:22:29 | Anthony Sottile | set | messageid: <1551982949.8.0.116257886202.issue33944@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-03-07 18:22:29 | Anthony Sottile | link | issue33944 messages |
| 2019-03-07 18:22:29 | Anthony Sottile | create | |